We understand things only in relation to other
things. I'm tall when I stand next to my wife, I'm short when I stand next to
Kareem Abdul-Jabber (which I did once). We need a frame of reference to
place everything within, and the human body - ourselves - is the obvious
starting point.
As designers we get to be experts on proportion
and how parts relate to the whole. We should be experts on how we fit into the
world around us.
We will look at the proportions of the human
figure, looking at what in Western art are agreed upon 'ideal' proportions, and
how, even if none of us conform to the ideal, it can be a useful starting
point.
I imagine everyone has seen Da Vinci's drawing
of Vitruvian Man, a man encompassed in a square and circle. This comes from the
Roman writer Vitruvius, whose 'Ten Books of Architecture' are the only
classical writings on architecture to come down to us (go Google him now!). He
tells us:
"For if a man be placed flat on his back,
with his hands and feet extended, and a pair of compasses centered at his
navel, the fingers and toes of his two hands and feet will touch the circumference
of a circle described therefrom. And just as the human body yields a circular
outline, so too a square figure may be found from it. For if we measure the
distance from the soles of the feet to the top of the head, and then apply that
measure to the outstretched arms, the breadth will be found to be the same as
the height, as in the case of plane surfaces which are perfectly square."
His work did not survive Roman times with its
original illustrations intact, and there were several attempts to work a
plausible image of Vitruvius's ideal before Da Vinci's happy drawing. It shows
how our height is, in theory, the same as the width of our out stretched arms,
fingertip to fingertip.
I will confess that this doesn't work for me:
the distance of my outstretched arms is shorter than my height - one of many
ways I fail to correspond to the ideal.
Vitruvius also tells us "the head from the
chin to the crown is an eighth [of the height of the body]" and this has
been used as an ideal proportion in Classical times, to be rediscovered in the
Renaissance, and taught in art schools to this day.
Is anyone 8 heads high? Look at people around
you - try employing the method I illustrate here. Are there people 7 heads
high? 7 1/2? 6?
Andrew Loomis here illustrates the useful
landmarks of the body and the accepted proportions. The crotch is the mid point
of the body - the length of the legs is equal to the torso and head. The lower
legs are equal to the upper legs, with the knee at the halfway point - likewise
the upper arm and lower arm are equal, with the elbow as the midpoint.
[Feel free to be slightly offended by Loomis's
definitions of ideal proportions - these are from his 'Figure Drawing For
All It's Worth,' published in 1943, and carriedthe attitudes of its times. But
he is an excellent teacher - 'Figure Drawing For All It's Worth' has been
recently republished and might be a good book to have)
Try measuring yourself against these
proportions. How many heads high are you? Compare your wingspan to your height.
Where do the major landmarks of the body fall on you?
(I also include this one just because it’s so
trippy. A woman, in this example, is 7 ½ heads high)
Your Mission
Measure yourself thoroughly and accurately,
head to toe. Measure an object (a chair, a rhinoceros, what have you). Draw
yourself next to the object, calling out dimensions, midpoints, and
correspondences between you and the object. You may work in the metric system
if that's what you are used to, but now may be a good time to begin working in
feet and inches. And take a good look at Andrew Loomis's illustrated
proportions, for you will, eventually, be called upon to memorize them - but in
the meantime, see how you can make this assignment fun for yourself. Send to me
by Saturday, July 28.
Onwards and upwards!
Chris
No comments:
Post a Comment